MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2801152711 · doi:10.2110/jsr.2018.24

Storm-influenced Intrashelf Systems: Sedimentological Characterization of the Famennian Three Forks Formation, Williston Basin, U.S.A.

2018· article· en· W2801152711 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Alyssa Franklin, J. Frederick Sarg

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Sedimentary Research · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersColorado School of Mines
KeywordsGeologySedimentary rockCitationIconStructural basinPaleontologyStormArchaeologyLibrary scienceOceanographyHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The Three Forks Formation, composed of intrashelf deposits, is the chronostratigraphic equivalent of the greater Palliser Formation (Wabamum Formation in the subsurface, western Canada) ramp and shelf deposits. These sub-equatorial Famennian (Late Devonian) formations represent deposition on one of the most extensive epicontinental carbonate systems. Three main environments constitute the Three Forks Formation intrashelf deposits described as facies associations (FA): 1) storm-influenced shallow shelf, 2) arid shallow shelf, and 3) storm-influenced mudflats. Storm-influenced shallow shelf (FA 1) deposits contain three main facies: F1, distorted claystones that contain a moderate abundance of mobile feeding traces and syneresis cracks; F2, laminated mudstones; and F3, dolomudstones that include mobile feeding traces, escape burrows, and opportunistic suspension-feeding colonies. These facies demonstrate abundant sharp layer contacts which imply scouring, high-depositional-rate sedimentary structures, and wave-formed features. Rare facies of FA 1 include: F4, brecciated to distorted mudstones, syndepositional deformation through dewatering, evaporite precipitation and dissolution, and bioturbation; and F5, thin-bedded quartz sandstones, representing preserved and unmixed floods into the shallow basin. Arid shallow shelf (FA 2) deposits consist of: F6, mosaic anhydrites, which imply periods of restriction and evaporation at a basinal scale. Storm-influenced mudflat (FA 3) facies include: F7, rarely preserved, seiche-deposited thin laminated mudstones; F8, abundantly preserved clast-supported breccias; and F9, massive or intraclastic mudstones. These deposits represent a spectrum of strength and influence of mudflat storm surge that locally transported mudstone clasts derived from FA 1. Mechanical sedimentary structures and trace fossils in all facies indicate a depositional system dominated by storm-generated waves and currents in both the shallow intrashelf and mudflats. The intrashelf was also influenced by marine and freshwater incursions to form a mixed carbonate, evaporite, and siliciclastic system. The results of this study contribute to the global knowledge of epicontinental systems, specifically in the storm-influenced shallow intrashelf and mudflats.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.665
Threshold uncertainty score0.673

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Sedimentary ResearchSame topicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysisFrench-language works237,207