Healthcare Utilization after Acute Kidney Injury in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Little is known about the long-term burden of AKI in the pediatric intensive care unit. We aim to evaluate if pediatric AKI is associated with higher health service use post-hospital discharge. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: This is a retrospective cohort study of children (≤18 years old) admitted to two tertiary centers in Montreal, Canada. Only the first admission per patient was included. AKI was defined in two ways: serum creatinine alone or serum creatinine and/or urine output. The outcomes were 30-day, 1-year, and 5-year hospitalizations, emergency room visits, and physician visits per person-time using provincial administrative data. Univariable and multivariable Poisson regression were used to evaluate AKI associations with outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 2041 children were included (56% male, mean admission age 6.5±5.8 years); 299 of 1575 (19%) developed AKI defined using serum creatinine alone, and when urine output was included in the AKI definition 355 of 1622 (22%) children developed AKI. AKI defined using serum creatinine alone and AKI defined using serum creatinine and urine output were both associated with higher 1- and 5-year hospitalization risk (AKI by serum creatinine alone adjusted relative risk, 1.42; 95% confidence interval, 1.12 to 1.82; and 1.80; 1.54 to 2.11, respectively [similar when urine output was included]) and higher 5-year physician visits (adjusted relative risk, 1.26; 95% confidence interval, 1.14 to 1.39). AKI was not associated with emergency room use after adjustments. CONCLUSIONS: AKI is independently associated with higher hospitalizations and physician visits postdischarge.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".