The Trace of Masculinity in Indonesian Women Politicians Campaign Speech
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The research was based on the importance of greater involvement of women in the management of the State. This research aims to describe masculine female politician Indonesia campaign speech. In this study used a qualitative approach in the form of Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) centred on the dismantling of the ulterior motive behind the language that is used to find the real message. The analysis was done to show the representation of the subject. Based on the results of research on speech discourse campaign prospective of Candidate Regent Kutai Kartanegara namely Rita Widyasari found that when women are involved in politics and do the speech of the campaign to attract sympathy glacial, the choice of the language used in speech tends to be masculine. In short, there was a campaign speech masculine woman through adjective apply, the question directly with the affirmative imperative sentence, constructions, the reference quantity (number), the sentence is active, and the presence of herself with the first person singular. The masculine act of campaign speech is applied so that women who tend to be "tough" transformed into a recognized figure of leadership because that assertiveness and straightforwardness in the language used.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".