ANALISIS PENGARUH KOORDINASI INTRA-ORGANIZATIONAL TERHADAP KINERJA PUSKESMAS DALAM PROGRAM PEMANTAUAN PERTUMBUHAN DAN PERKEMBANGAN BALITA (Studi di Puskesmas Kabupaten Banjar)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Data of toddler with underweight in Puskesmas Banjar from 2011 to 2014 has increased. Thenational target for toddlers with underweight is <5% and the target area for toddlers withunderweight is <1.5%. In national target, the increase is still below the target of 3.25%. However,when compared with the target area, the percentage of children under five with underweight at thePuskesmas Kabupaten Banjar Martapura is still a problem. This study aims to analyze the influenceof intra-organizational coordination on the performance of Puskesmas in growth and developmentchildhood program. This research is a quantitative research with analytic observational approach.The sample of research is 18 Puskesmas. The number of respondents from this study amounted to 126people spread in 18 Puskesmas. So the information from each puskesmas obtained from 7respondents. The results of the study were analyzed based on the type of dependency theory ofThompson and coordination mechanisms theory of Mintzberg. The result of the research shows thatcoordination adjustment has an effect on performance. This means that if the type of dependence inaccordance with the coordination mechanism, it will have a positive impact on the resultingperformance. The results of this study prove the theory of coordination by Shortell, coordination is aconscious activity to unite and harmonize different potentials so that it can function harmoniously toachieve organizational goals. In this research, the coordination is operationalized to unify theactivities implemented by the involved sections in the Puskesmas to achieve the optimal performanceof growth and development childhood program.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".