MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2801660484 · doi:10.1080/01419870.2018.1444190

Beyond multiculturalism: interculturalism, diversity and urban governance

2018· article· en· W2801660484 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEthnic and Racial Studies · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicItalian Social Issues and Migration
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInterculturalismMulticulturalismDiversity (politics)Inclusion (mineral)Context (archaeology)SociologyCorporate governanceArgument (complex analysis)Gender studiesRefugeePolitical scienceAffirmative actionPublic administrationLawAnthropologyGeographyManagement

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This review article discusses the volume by Giovanna Marconi and Elena Ostanel, eds. The Intercultural City: Migration, Minorities and the Management of Diversity, I.B. Tauris, 2016, in the larger context of studies on inclusion of migrants in cities. It evaluates the merits of interculturalism argument presented by the editors and contributing authors as it is applied to the migrants’ and refugees’ needs and demands from the city and public at large, and the transformation of identities of public spaces challenging assumptions of cultural uniformity at the national level. The issue of the viability of equitable and normatively justifiable governance of difference above and beyond multiculturalism is a very important one, especially so in an era where Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals and expulsions of the Dreamers from the American cities have become part of our daily reality.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.509
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.072
GPT teacher head0.375
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it