MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2801718177 · doi:10.4000/contextes.6415

Adieu, Paris ! de Simone Routier à la croisée de l’intime et du médiatique 

2018· article· fr· W2801718177 on OpenAlexaffabout
Mylène Bédard

Bibliographic record

VenueContextes · 2018
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLiterature and Culture Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article propose de mettre en lumière le rapport de la femme de lettres canadienne-française Simone Routier à la presse, lequel paraît reposer sur une compréhension fine des enjeux économiques, politiques, de mobilité dans le champ littéraire et de prestige qui y sont associés. Pour ce faire, je m’attarderai à son journal d’évacuation Adieu, Paris !, qui s’inscrit à la croisée du journal intime et du reportage de guerre, de même qu’à sa collaboration au quotidien L’Événement pendant son séjour européen (1930-1940). La forme du reportage qui module le journal de Routier s’avère d’ailleurs compatible avec la stratégie du succès privilégiée par l’écrivaine puisqu’elle met en scène une figure, celle du reporter, qui se veut rassembleuse. L’analyse de l’incidence du médiatique dans le récit que Routier fait de son évacuation, qui touche aussi bien la poétique, la forme que l’ethos construit par l’écrivaine, permettra de mieux saisir le statut particulier du texte, à la fois commande, journal intime et reportage de guerre, ses visées politiques et son rôle déterminant dans la suite de la trajectoire de la femme de lettres.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.095
Threshold uncertainty score0.190

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0130.011
Scholarly communication0.0140.007
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0510.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueContextesSame topicLiterature and Culture StudiesFrench-language works237,207