MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2801819274 · doi:10.1139/tcsme-2010-0005

DETERMINATION OF THE ANALYTICAL WORKSPACE BOUNDARIES OF A NOVEL 2-DOF PLANAR TENSEGRITY MECHANISM

2010· article· en· W2801819274 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueTransactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Analysis and Optimization
Canadian institutionsRoyal Military College of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTensegrityWorkspaceMechanism (biology)PlanarKinematicsPayload (computing)InertiaComputer scienceControl theory (sociology)Simple (philosophy)Kinematic chainControl engineeringTopology (electrical circuits)Classical mechanicsEngineeringStructural engineeringPhysicsRobotArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Tensegrity mechanisms are slowly emerging as potential alternatives to more conventional mechanisms for certain types of applications where a reduced inertia of the mobile parts and a high payload to weight ratio are sought. With this in mind, a two-degree-of-freedom planar tensegrity mechanism is developed using a simple actuation strategy to keep the mechanism in self-stressed configurations. Solutions to the mechanism’s direct and inverse kinematic problems are first developed and are then used to determine analytical expressions for its workspace boundaries.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.894
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it