MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2801861768 · doi:10.1093/sleep/zsy061.252

0253 Sleep Patterns As A function of Breastfeeding: From Infancy to Childhood

2018· article· en· W2801861768 on OpenAlexaffabout
Marie‐Hélène Pennestri, Christine Laganière, Irina Pokhvisneva, Andrée–Anne Bouvette–Turcot, Meir Steiner, Michael Meaney, Hélène Gaudreau

Bibliographic record

VenueSLEEP · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBreastfeeding Practices and Influences
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityDouglas Mental Health University InstituteMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBreastfeedingMedicinePediatricsSleep (system call)Psychological interventionBreast feedingLongitudinal studyPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Many studies have documented that breastfeeding has numerous benefits, both in children and in mothers, and the World Health Organization recommends exclusive breastfeeding for the first 6 months. During the same developmental period, parents are encouraged to teach their infant sleeping through the night: behavioral sleep interventions are proposed at an increasingly younger age. However, among the factors associated with sleep fragmentation, breastfeeding is often invoked. Whether sleep-wake patterns associated with feeding method in early infancy persist from infancy to childhood remains to clarify. This longitudinal study aims to assess sleep patterns from 6 to 24 months, as a function of feeding method at six months. Data were drawn from the Maternal Adversity, Vulnerability, and Neurodevelopment study (n=388). At 6 months, infants were divided into 2 groups, as a function of breastfeeding status (presence-absence). The longest consecutive sleep period and the total nocturnal sleep duration were assessed at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months with maternal reports. Sleep variables were compared with two-way ANOVAs with one independent factor (breastfeeding or not at 6 months) and one repeated measure (age). At 6 months old, most infants were still breastfed (63%). There was a significant interaction between breastfeeding status at 6 months and age, on the longest consecutive sleep period (p<0.001). At 6 and 12 months, breastfed infants had a shorter longest consecutive sleep period than non-breastfed infants, (6:15 ± 2:49 vs 7:56 ± 2:49, p <0.001; 7:26 ± 3:16 vs 8:51 ± 2:52, p <0.001), with no difference at 24 and 36 months (p>0.05). There was no interaction between breastfeeding and age on total nocturnal sleep duration (p>0.05). While an age effect was present (p <0.001), no group effect was observed (p>0.05). Although breastfeeding at 6 months was associated with shorter consecutive sleep duration at 6 and 12 months, total nocturnal sleep duration was similar among the 2 groups at every timepoint. Parents should be informed that the transient sleep fragmentation associated with breastfeeding in infancy do not seem to impact total nocturnal sleep duration, nor long-term sleep-wake patterns. McGill University

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.661
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSLEEPSame topicBreastfeeding Practices and InfluencesFrench-language works237,207