MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2801880241 · doi:10.1353/ajh.2018.0028

A Vanished Ideology: Essays on the Jewish Communist Movement in the English-Speaking World in the Twentieth Century ed. by Matthew B. Hoffman, Henry F. Srebrnik

2018· article· en· W2801880241 on OpenAlex
Andrew Sloin

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Jewish history · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicJewish and Middle Eastern Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCommunismJudaismIdeologyPolitical radicalismPersecutionPoliticsAntisemitismSocialismHistoryHaskalahReligious studiesJewish studiesLawPolitical sciencePhilosophyArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: A Vanished Ideology: Essays on the Jewish Communist Movement in the English-Speaking World in the Twentieth Century ed. by Matthew B. Hoffman, Henry F. Srebrnik Andrew Sloin (bio) A Vanished Ideology: Essays on the Jewish Communist Movement in the English-Speaking World in the Twentieth Century. By Matthew B. Hoffman and Henry F. Srebrnik, eds. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2016. 282 pp. Insofar as the image of the Ẓydokomuna, or Jewish Communist, has constituted a core trope of modern antisemitism, it is hardly surprising that historians of the Jewish experience have shied away from the topic of Jewish participation in the global Communist movement. Relegated [End Page 314] to the margins of inquiry during the era of Cold War Liberal consensus, Jewish involvement in the Communist movement—particularly within the United States—has most frequently been treated in apologetic, evasive, or condemnatory tones. In light of this, Matthew Hoffman and Henry Srebrnik’s illuminating and nuanced edited volume stands as a welcome, original, and necessary contribution to the study of global Jewish political radicalism. The nine essays comprising this volume examine the complex, fraught relationship between Jews and the Communist Party in a transnational context by focusing on the experience of Jews in the Anglophone world, including the United States, Canada, Great Britain, Australia, and South Africa. An introductory essay by Hoffman and Srebrnik sets the stage by tracing the rise of Jewish Communism as a distinct form of radicalism related to, but separate from other forms of Jewish socialism—most prominently, that of the Jewish Socialist Bund—insofar as the movement was shaped explicitly by allegiance, however critical, to the Bolshevik Revolution and Soviet regime. Throughout, the volume examines how resultant tensions between Communist universalist ambitions, the Moscow-centric policies of the Communist International (Comintern), and the ambivalent pull of Jewish ethnic and national identity structured the development of the Jewish Communist movement globally. The strength of the volume lies in the many archivally-rich and nuanced case studies that demonstrate these tensions unfolding on the ground in various milieus. Matthew Hoffman, for example, explores how editors of the Morgn-Frayhayt and other Yiddish-language Communist publications in the United States negotiated the sharp twists of Comintern policy toward rival socialist movements, particularly as the Moscow line shifted from outright hostility to the tactics of the Popular Front in 1935. In doing so, he highlights increasingly ambivalent relations between Yiddish-speaking Communists and English-speaking, mostly non-Jewish party members for whom the Popular Front signaled the end of the need for sectarian “foreign-language” sections within the party. In the process of negotiating these tensions, he argues that American Jewish Communists, much like their Soviet counterparts, created a largely autonomous and distinctly American form of Yiddish Communist culture that frequently challenged Moscow-dictated party lines and the dictates of party leaders in the United States. Despite focusing on the “English-speaking world,” it is the threads of distinctly Yiddish politics and processes of political acculturation that tie most of the volume’s essays together into a coherent whole. In one outstanding highlight, Jennifer Young contributes a nuanced analysis of the conflicted legacy of the Communist-affiliated Jewish People’s Fraternal [End Page 315] Order (JPFO), an offshoot of the International Workers Order (IWO), which emerged in the vibrant political incubator of interwar, Yiddish New York. Through an impressive archivally-grounded study, Young examines how the JPFO mobilized interethnic and interracial ties—focused in particular around campaigns against global fascism—to build a vibrant political coalition that played a significant role in Jewish life before being suppressed during Cold War anti-Communist campaigns. At a more intimate level, Gennady Estraikh traces the rise and decline of the Jewish Communist movement in the United States through a sympathetic yet critical portrait of the tempestuous editor of the Frayhayt and Communist polemicist Paul Novick. Estraikh masterfully depicts Novick’s turn from leading party loyalist to reluctant postwar critic, driven by the resurgence of antisemitism in the Soviet Union and Novick’s own growing sympathy for Israel despite the party’s hostile line. In short, Novick’s life serves as a metonym for the contradictory Jewish...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.810
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.005
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it