Numerical evaluation of a single ellipsoid motion in Newtonian and power-law fluids
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A computational model is developed for simulating the motion of a single ellipsoid suspended in a Newtonian and power-law fluid, respectively. Based on a finite element method (FEM), the approach consists in seeking solutions for the linear and angular particle velocities using a minimization algorithm, such that the net hydrodynamic force and torque acting on the ellipsoid are zero. For a Newtonian fluid subjected to a simple shear flow, the Jeffery’s predictions are recovered at any aspect ratios. The motion of a single ellipsoidal fiber is found to be slightly disturbed by the shear-thinning character of the suspending fluid, when compared with the Jeffery’s solutions. Surprisingly, the perturbation can be completely neglected for a particle with a large aspect ratio. Furthermore, the particle centroid is also found to translate with the same linear velocity as the undisturbed simple shear flow evaluated at particle centroid. This is confirmed by recent works based on experimental investigations and modeling approach (1-2).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".