MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

115 Six cases of relapsing polychondritis presenting as severe airways disease to a secondary care centre in one year

2018· article· en· W2802099842 on OpenAlexaff
Shirish Dubey, Colin Gelder, Russell Wong, Joanna Shakespeare, Nicholas Hart, David D’Cruz

Bibliographic record

VenueLara D. Veeken · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOtitis Media and Relapsing Polychondritis
Canadian institutionsSt. Thomas Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineRelapsing polychondritisDiseasePediatricsDermatologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Relapsing polychondritis (RP) a multi-system disease characterised by episodes of progressive inflammation and subsequent degeneration of cartilage and connective tissue throughout the body. The incidence of this condition is believed to be less than one in a million in the UK (Hazra et al 2015). We present six cases of RP identified at a local respiratory department during a single year whose symptoms had previously been attributed to either severe asthma or severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Methods: All patients had presented to the difficult airways clinic at University Hospital Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust (UHCW) in Coventry with severe breathlessness, cough and wheeze. RP was diagnosed using the McAdam criteria and disease activity assessed using the Relapsing Polychondritis Disease Activity Index (RPDAI). Tracheobronchomalacia was usually initially suspected on clinical examination particularly the presence of fixed inspiratory or harsh monophonic inspiratory and expiratory wheeze. Diagnosis was confirmed by a combination of lung function testing, inspiratory and expiratory CT and bronchoscopy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.263
Threshold uncertainty score0.979

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLara D. VeekenSame topicOtitis Media and Relapsing PolychondritisFrench-language works237,207