Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction Marcia B. Hall Part I. Before Rome: 1. Young Raphael and the practice of painting in Renaissance Italy Jeryldene M. Wood 2. From the Court of Urbino to the Curia and Rome: Raphael and his patrons 1500-1508 Sheryl E. Reiss Part II. Rome: 3. The contested city: urban form in early sixteenth-century Rome Linda Pellecchia 4. The Vatican Stanze Ingrid Rowland 5. One role, two sitters, one artist: Raphael's papal portraits Joanna Woods-Marsden 6. The competition between Raphael and Michelangelo and Sebastiano's role in it Constanza Barbieri Part III. Raphael and his Successors: 7. Raphael's workshop and the development of a managerial style Bette Talvacchia 8. Raphael's multiples Patricia Emison 9. Raphael drawings, pro-contra Linda Wolk-Simon Part IV. The Assessment of History: 10. Classicism, Mannerism, and the Relieflike style Marcia B. Hall 11. French identity in the realm of Raphael Carl Goldstein 12. Raphael's European fame in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries Giovanna Perini 13. Restoring Raphael Cathleen Hoeniger.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".