Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction Marcia B. Hall Part I. Before Rome: 1. Young Raphael and the practice of painting in Renaissance Italy Jeryldene M. Wood 2. From the Court of Urbino to the Curia and Rome: Raphael and his patrons 1500-1508 Sheryl E. Reiss Part II. Rome: 3. The contested city: urban form in early sixteenth-century Rome Linda Pellecchia 4. The Vatican Stanze Ingrid Rowland 5. One role, two sitters, one artist: Raphael's papal portraits Joanna Woods-Marsden 6. The competition between Raphael and Michelangelo and Sebastiano's role in it Constanza Barbieri Part III. Raphael and his Successors: 7. Raphael's workshop and the development of a managerial style Bette Talvacchia 8. Raphael's multiples Patricia Emison 9. Raphael drawings, pro-contra Linda Wolk-Simon Part IV. The Assessment of History: 10. Classicism, Mannerism, and the Relieflike style Marcia B. Hall 11. French identity in the realm of Raphael Carl Goldstein 12. Raphael's European fame in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries Giovanna Perini 13. Restoring Raphael Cathleen Hoeniger.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.268 | 0.156 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".