MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2802178548 · doi:10.1093/eurpub/cky048.108

3.10-P12Immigration and dental health care-lessons learned from new Chinese immigrant families with young children (ages 0-6) in British Columbia, Canada

2018· article· en· W2802178548 on OpenAlexaffabout
H Gao, Brenda T. Poon, Roderick Harrison, Kavita R. Mathu‐Muju

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Public Health · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicGlobal Health Workforce Issues
Canadian institutionsLearning PartnershipUniversity of British Columbia Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImmigrationDental careDental healthMedicineFamily medicineGerontologyHistoryArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Dental caries is the most common chronic condition affecting young children (ages 0-6) worldwide, despite being mostly preventable through effective dental health care practices. Immigrant children are disproportionately affected by dental caries in both Canada and the U.S. This qualitative study examines multi-level factors influencing dental health care practices for young Chinese immigrant children in British Columbia, Canada. Methods: Chinese immigrant parents (n = 15), dental health professionals (n = 4) and social service providers (n = 3) were purposefully sampled and recruited through five community sites in Vancouver and Richmond, BC (March-June 2016). Semi-structured individual interviews were conducted. Verbatim transcription, open line-by-line coding, and thematic analysis were performed to analyse the interview data. Results: Key facilitators include: (1). Social network. Family members and friends support by being directly involved in care or giving advice (2). Community. Community dental programmes help families initiate and maintain effort in dental home care for children (3). Dental professionals. Visits to dental professionals are opportunities to solicit feedback and receive education on dental care. Major barriers include: (1). Knowledge and information. Receiving inconsistent messages on and lacking practical knowledge of when and how to start dental care for children (2). Economic concern. High cost and lacking dental insurance discourage access to professional dental care (3). Language and culture. Limited access to translated dental informational materials. Conclusions: Support needed: (1). Information. Wider distribution of translated consistent dental health care information, targeting first-time parents and the broader immigrant community (2). Insurance. Provision of public dental insurance for purchase at subsidised rates by income levels (3). Community. Increased engagement of parents through existing community networks and social media in early dental care for children. Main message: Increased support from government and community is needed to encourage and facilitate new immigrant parents in overcoming multi-layered challenges and attaining better dental health outcomes for children.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.053
Threshold uncertainty score0.387

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0210.004
Scholarly communication0.0040.001
Open science0.0020.005
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of Public HealthSame topicGlobal Health Workforce IssuesFrench-language works237,207