Passion and Arrogance: Poetic Craft and Topographies of Remembrance in the Work of Michael Hartnett
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In his seminal study, Oral Tradition as History, Jan Vansina argues that landscape is properly viewed as a layered and richly textured depository of both individual and communal memory. The landscape is implicated in the processes of retrospective remembrance, and it is also active in the creation of memory. Accenting the articulacy of topographical memory, Vansina suggests that "the landscape, changed by man or not, often was a powerful mnemonic device" (45) WTiile cartographic surveys and pastoral or romantic representations of physical terrains furnished limited versions of geographical record, in many respects such discourses are differentially collusive in the pacification of lived memory. It is my argument that such representations belong to the realm of historical discourse, and as such, are estranged from the realm of memory. Rather than celebrating or tracing the actuality of the concrete, the sacredness of the everyday or the evolution of the local, the historical record tends to analyse, dismember and consign the "traditional" and the "past" to anteriority In canvassing its own universality, history homogenises human experience and, thereby, neglects the multiplicity of collective and individual memory. It is in the light of Pierre Nora's contention that "Memory takes root in the concrete, in spaces, gestures, images, and objects; history binds itself strictly to temporal continuities, to progressions and to relations between things" (633), that I wish to broach the subaltern memorial signatures of Michael Hartnett's poetry. As Michael Smith's epigraphic tribute confirms, Hartnett's poetry embodies elements of Irish culture that are too often relegated to the wistful elegies of the picturesque, or the cheapened apologies of a society addicted to the promises of modernisation. Hartnett's work not only reflects the qualitative, and lived, communion between memory, tribe and topography, but his poetic craft is a vocational project that assumes its urgency from that very landscape. Such topographical preoccupations are long established in the Gaelic literary tradition, and are also evident in the poetry of contemporary Irish language art
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".