MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Perfil de pacientes com obesidade grau III atendidos em um centro de referência em obesidade

2019· article· pt· W2802416555 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Enfermagem Atual In Derme · 2019
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealthcare Regulation
Canadian institutionsCanadian Obesity Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineObesityGynecologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31011/1519-339X.2018a18n84.1 Objetiva-se caracterizar o perfi l de pacientes com obesidade grau III atendidos em um Centro de Referênciaem Obesidade. Estudo retrospectivo e descritivo, realizado por meio de análise documental de 310 prontuáriosde pacientes atendidos no Centro de Referência em Obesidade do Rio de Janeiro, no período de maio de 2012a fevereiro de 2015, seguido de análise descritiva dos dados utilizando o programa Microsoft Offi ce Excel. Osresultados mostraram a predominância do sexo feminino com 234 (75%) e 76 (25%) do sexo masculino. A idadevariou entre 18 e 73 anos, com média e desvio padrão de 43,98 ± 12,41 anos. Quanto ao IMC, obteve-se a médiade 51,70 ± 7,73 kg/m2. Constatou-se alta prevalência de hipertensão arterial, com 242 (78%) pacientes e DiabetesMellitus com 149 (48%), ainda 136 (43%) possuem hipertensão e diabetes associadas. Conclui-se que as estratégiasde assistência individualizada, subsidiadas pelo conhecimento das características relacionadas aos aspectos sociaise às comorbidades associadas à obesidade, são fundamentais para prevenção de complicações e melhoria daqualidade de vida em pacientes obesos.Palavras-chave: Obesidade Mórbida; Enfermagem; Hipertensão; Diabetes Mellitus. ABstRACtAimed to characterize the profi le of patients with obesity grade III attended at a Reference Center in Obesity. Aretrospective and descriptive study carried out through documentary analysis of 310 medical records of patientsattended at the Reference Center in Obesity of Rio de Janeiro, from may 2012 to February 2015, followed by adescriptive analysis of the data using the Microsoft Offi ce Excel. The results showed a female predominancewith 234 (75%) and 76 (25%) male. The age varied between 18 and 73 years, average and standard deviationof ± 12.41 43.98 years. About the BMI, average of 51.70 ± 7.73 kg/m2. It has a high prevalence of hypertension,with 242 (78%) patients and Diabetes Mellitus with 149 (48%), 136 (43%) still have hypertension and diabetes. Itconcludes that the individualized assistance strategies, funded by the knowledge of the characteristics related tosocial aspects and the comorbidities associated with obesity, are fundamental for the prevention of complicationsand improvement of the quality of life in obese patients.Keywords: Morbid Obesity; Nursing; Hypertension; Diabetes Mellitus.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.061
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.397
Teacher spread0.334 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it