MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2802608175 · doi:10.1002/er.4084

Modeling of liquid water transport in a proton exchange membrane fuel cell gas flow channel with dynamic wettability

2018· article· en· W2802608175 on OpenAlexafffund
Yanzhou Qin, Xianguo Li, Yan Yin

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Energy Research · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFuel Cells and Related Materials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Science Foundation of Tianjin CityNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsWettingContact angleBreakupMechanicsWater transportFlow (mathematics)Materials scienceProton exchange membrane fuel cellTwo-phase flowVolumetric flow rateChannel (broadcasting)Water flowOpen-channel flowChemistryGeotechnical engineeringComposite materialMembraneEngineeringElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Liquid water transport in the gas flow channel is significantly important for the water removal and management in proton exchange membrane fuel cells. Previous numerical studies consider a single and constant static contact angle for the liquid water transport on the channel surface, which is insufficient to account for the dynamic wettability behavior of the flow. In this study, a dynamic wettability model is developed that incorporates the sliding angle and dynamic contact angles for the simulation of water transport in the flow channel. It is found that both the sliding and dynamic contact angles have significant impact on the characteristics of the water transport and dynamics in the flow channel. Water spreading on the channel surface is elliptic, and its minor and major axes oscillate out of phase with the droplet height. The pressure loss for the 2-phase flow in the channel is directly related to this oscillation and deformation of the droplet shape. Flow channel surface with a small sliding angle facilitates the water transport and removal and reduces the associated pressure loss in the channel. The conventional static wettability model would overpredict droplet deformation and breakup as well as the pressure loss in the channel.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.256
Threshold uncertainty score0.303

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Energy ResearchSame topicFuel Cells and Related MaterialsFrench-language works237,207