MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2802620589 · doi:10.1093/sleep/zsy061.863

0864 A Randomized Controlled Trial of Light Therapy for Insomnia Symptoms in Fatigued Cancer Survivors

2018· article· en· W2802620589 on OpenAlexaffabout
Sheila N. Garland, Jillian A. Johnson, Linda E. Carlson, Nicole Rodriguez, Josée Savard, Tavis S. Campbell

Bibliographic record

VenueSLEEP · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicSleep and related disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalUniversity of CalgaryMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsActigraphyInsomniaRandomized controlled trialMedicinePittsburgh Sleep Quality IndexSleep diaryLight therapyPhysical therapySleep disorderSleep onsetInternal medicineSleep qualityCircadian rhythmPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cancer-related fatigue (CRF) and insomnia are highly comorbid, suggesting that these two symptoms may share physiological, psychological, and behavioral mechanisms. The objective of this secondary analysis was to examine the impact of a 4-week light therapy intervention on insomnia severity in cancer survivors with clinical levels of fatigue. Additional outcomes included self-reported sleep quality and sleep continuity, assessed with sleep diary and actigraphy. This 4-week randomized controlled trial recruited post-treatment cancer survivors who met ICD-10 criteria for CRF. Participants were randomly assigned to a light therapy device that produced either bright white light (BWL; treatment) or dim red light (DRL; active control). The devices were used daily for 30 minutes upon waking for 28 days. Participants completed the Insomnia Severity Index at baseline, week 2, and week 4, and completed the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, sleep diaries (one week), and actigraphy (one week) both at baseline and during week 4. Adherence was tracked using integrated device loggers. A total of 81 participants were randomly assigned to receive BWL (n=42) or DRL (n=39). Linear mixed models analyses revealed a significant group-by-time interaction for insomnia symptoms, F(2,152.2)=3.51, p=.032. Insomnia severity improved from baseline to week 2 and from baseline to post-intervention in both groups; however, BWL condition continued to improve after 2 weeks, whereas symptoms in the DRL group began to worsen after week 2, though this was not significant. Both groups reported improvements in sleep quality (p<.001), reduction in diary measured sleep onset latency (p<.01), and improved sleep efficiency (p<.001), and actigraphy measured nocturnal wake time (p<.05). A 4-week light therapy intervention improved sleep parameters in clinically fatigued cancer survivors, but there was no difference between the two intervention conditions. Future research is warranted to explore this effect in cancer survivors with CRF and diagnosed insomnia disorder. Canadian Cancer Society Research Institute, Innovation Grant #: 2012–701425.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSLEEPSame topicSleep and related disordersFrench-language works237,207