Memory, Milestones, and Monuments: A Peripatetic Exploration of the West Side of UBC Campus
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Reflexive walking practices have gained increased attention as creative and analytic tools in recent years. This article documents a performative event in this vein that occurred in April 2016 at the University of British Columbia as part of the West Coast’s annual Tri-University Graduate Colloquium in Theatre and Performance Research. The hour-long Amble explored a portion of the host campus reflecting on the Colloquium theme, “Milestones and Commemoration.” Presenters staged interventions at select sites as provocations to consider how institutions such as universities focus and direct complex layers of cultural memory and amnesia, forms of diverse representation (or lack thereof), and eruptions of collegiate performance and performativity. The Tri-U Amble repeatedly unveiled shadows in the commemorative spaces it considered. Sites explored include two First Nations outdoor artworks, two portrait busts, the historic Irving K. Barber Learning Centre, the site of an intramural spectacle, and the War Memorial Gym. The article attempts to capture the dynamic flow of the Amble’s trek across campus, progressing gradually in mnemonic inquiry from the political and cultural, to the collegiate, and finally to the personal.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it