A rare dark morph in the Canadian Arctic raises questions about molting and polymorphism in Long-tailed Jaeger (<i>Stercorarius longicaudus</i>)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The existence of a dark morph in adult Long-tailed Jaeger (Stercorarius longicaudus) is still unclear and debated. For this species, dark plumages occur in juveniles and immatures, but no dark morph adults have yet been unequivocally confirmed. Ambiguous reports of presumed dark morph adults and lack of information on molt progression of immatures generate confusion regarding this issue. Here we describe observations conducted in the Canadian Arctic (Bylot Island) and show that Long-tailed Jaegers can apparently exhibit dark morph adult-like plumage (i.e., individuals showing some obvious criteria associated with definitive alternate ‘adult breeding' plumage). Careful examination of those sightings, however, also revealed immature characteristics, indicating the high variability of the first prealternate molt in this species. Well-documented observations of rare plumages like the one reported in this study are needed to elucidate molting strategies and polymorphism in Long-tailed Jaeger. Received 4 October 2016. Accepted 3 June 2017.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".