MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2802668962

The Advocate's Archive: Walter Rudnicki and the Fight for Indigenous Rights in Canada, 1955–2010

2018· article· en· W2802668962 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Amanda Linden

Bibliographic record

VenueArchivaria (Association of Canadian Archivists) · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicDigital and Traditional Archives Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndigenousArchivistPolitical scienceLibrary scienceGovernment (linguistics)Economic JusticeIndigenous rightsRecords managementEthnologyPublic administrationLawMedia studiesHistorySociologyHuman rights
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article explores the significant contribution that Walter Rudnicki (1925–2010) made to the pursuit of social justice for Indigenous people in Canada through his use of archival records. Rudnicki took on the role of archivist by acquiring, organizing, disseminating, and keeping records that document government–Indigenous relations. Totalling 90.25 metres in extent, the Walter Rudnicki Fonds at the University of Manitoba Archives & Special Collections is an impressive private collection amassed in order to make injustice visible. As a federal public servant working to develop innovative policies with Indigenous people between the 1950s and 1970s, Rudnicki had bitter personal experience with the ways that the Government of Canada’s practices regarding document creation and access to records thwarted Indigenous aims. Thereafter, he stressed that accessing and archiving records must play an indispensable role in protecting Indigenous peoples’ interests. He spent the rest of his life creating and employing an archive that would be used in advocacy for Indigenous rights. RÉSUMÉCet article explore la contribution importante de Walter Rudnicki (1925–2010) dans la recherche de justice sociale pour les peuples autochtones au Canada par son utilisation de documents d’archives. Rudnicki s’est attribué le rôle d’archiviste en faisant l’acquisition, le classement, la diffusion et la sauvegarde de documents d’archives qui décrivent les relations entre le gouvernement et les autochtones. D’une étendue de 90,25 mètres, le fonds Walter Rudnicki, conservé aux Archives et collections spéciales de la University of Manitoba, est une impressionnante collection privée amassée dans le but de rendre l’injustice visible. En tant que fonctionnaire fédéral qui travaillait au développement de politiques innovatrices avec les populations autochtones entre les années 1950 et les années 1970, Rudnicki a connu des expériences personnelles amères avec les façons dont les pratiques du Gouvernement du Canada en matière de création et d’accès aux documents ont contrecarré les visées des populations autochtones. Ensuite, il a insisté sur le fait que l’accès et l’archivage de documents doit jouer un rôle indispensable dans la protection des intérêts des populations autochtones. Il a passé le reste de sa vie à créer et à utiliser des archives qui serviraient à la défense des droits autochtones.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.955
Threshold uncertainty score0.989

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0450.010
Scholarly communication0.0080.002
Open science0.0020.005
Research integrity0.0020.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.175
Teacher spread0.167 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArchivaria (Association of Canadian Archivists)Same topicDigital and Traditional Archives ManagementFrench-language works237,207