MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2802668962

The Advocate's Archive: Walter Rudnicki and the Fight for Indigenous Rights in Canada, 1955–2010

2018· article· en· W2802668962 on OpenAlex
Amanda Linden

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueArchivaria (Association of Canadian Archivists) · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicDigital and Traditional Archives Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndigenousArchivistPolitical scienceLibrary scienceGovernment (linguistics)Economic JusticeIndigenous rightsRecords managementEthnologyPublic administrationLawMedia studiesHistorySociologyHuman rights
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article explores the significant contribution that Walter Rudnicki (1925-2010) made to the pursuit of social justice for Indigenous people in Canada through his use of archival records.Rudnicki took on the role of archivist by acquiring, organizing, disseminating, and keeping records that document government-Indigenous relations.Totalling 90.25 metres in extent, the Walter Rudnicki Fonds at the University of Manitoba Archives & Special Collections is an impressive private collection amassed in order to make injustice visible.As a federal public servant working to develop innovative policies with Indigenous people between the 1950s and 1970s, Rudnicki had bitter personal experience with the ways that the Government of Canada's practices regarding document creation and access to records thwarted Indigenous aims.Thereafter, he stressed that accessing and archiving records must play an indispensable role in protecting Indigenous peoples' interests.He spent the rest of his life creating and employing an archive that would be used in advocacy for Indigenous rights. ArticlesIn 2011, dozens of people gathered along the South Saskatchewan River for a special ceremony paying tribute to individuals who played significant roles in the pursuit of Mtis rights in Canada.A monument was erected to honour "Mtis Heroes" and "Friends of the Mtis," plaque headings under which names would be added for years to come. 1 The two names selected for the inaugural ceremony were Gabriel Dumont and Walter Rudnicki.The former was a celebrated leader who fought for Mtis recognition in the late 19th century, and the latter a wellknown supporter of Mtis causes.As a civil servant, private consultant, and advocate, Rudnicki took up the role of archivist by collecting and disseminating information that illustrated the history of government-Indigenous relations.He produced an immense personal archival collection that foregrounds the voices of Mtis, First Nations, and Inuit communities, groups, and organizations.This article explores Rudnicki's role in the Indigenous rights movement in Canada through his acquisition and use of both archival and contemporary records.For five decades, Rudnicki located, copied, and created records that ranged from reports to surveys to political cartoons; leaked and received leaked documents; and collected and contextualized grey literature.The approximately 90 metres of records in the Walter Rudnicki Fonds at the University of Manitoba Archives & Special Collections (UMA) is the result. 2 With increased frequency, archivists all over the world are exploring the intersections of social justice and archives.Canadian archival scholars Terry Cook and Joan Schwartz conducted an early study of the power of records and archives. 3By conceiving of archives as socially constructed institutions, the authors dispel the common myth of archives and the archival profession as neutral, innocent, and objective. 4 Instead, they assert archives as places of action.Archivists play a key role in determining what is remembered and what is forgotten through their ongoing work of accession, appraisal, description, preservation, access, and use.As one of the archivists most famously associated with the subject of 1

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.944
Threshold uncertainty score0.856

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.175
Teacher spread0.167 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it