MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2802741155 · doi:10.5539/ijc.v10n2p80

Trace Minerals, Physicochemical and Phytochemical Composition of Locally Prepared Beverages (Kunu and Sobo) Commonly Consumed by Tertiary Institution Students in Ekiti State, Nigeria

2018· article· en· W2802741155 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ojo Olabimpe Iyabo, Oyarekua Mojisola O., Jegede Rufus Olufemi

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Chemistry · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicHeavy Metals in Plants
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryPhytochemicalAtomic absorption spectroscopyComposition (language)TanninEnvironmental chemistryFood scienceVitaminNuclear chemistryBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Trace minerals, physicochemical and phytochemical composition were determined in locally prepared kunu and sobo commonly consumed by students of tertiary institutions in Ekiti State. Determination of pH and total solid was achieved by official method prescribed by Association of Analytical Chemists (AOAC). Trace minerals were determined by flame atomic absorption spectrometry (FAAS) while determination of vitamin C was achieved by oxidation-reduction methods using standard 2,6- Dichloro indo phenol (DCP). Result revealed that pH of the samples ranged from 5.26 in sobo to 6.02 in kunu with an average value of 5.64. Total solid ranged from 0.62% in sobo to 7.25% in kunu. Toxic minerals concentrations of Ni, Pb and Cd with values 0.14, 0.19 and 0.05 respectively were observed in sobo while 0.13, 0.01 and 0.04 were observed in kunu, all in parts per million respectively. All the values were within the permissible limits as set by FAO/WHO guidelines for food standard. Co and Cr were not detected in them. Vitamin C contents for sobo and kunu are 5.26 and 6.02 all in mg 100g respectively. The result when compared with the USDA (SR21) database shows that the two samples studied provided less adequate vitamin C content than their natural counterpart, but could serve as anticarcinogenic and antimuitagenic agents for human due to the presence of phytochemicals like phenolics, tannin and flavonoids in them.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of ChemistrySame topicHeavy Metals in PlantsFrench-language works237,207