MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2802835889 · doi:10.1002/ejoc.201800163

Deazapurine Analogues Bearing a 1<i>H</i>‐Pyrazolo[3,4‐<i>b</i>]pyridin‐3(2<i>H</i>)‐one Core: Synthesis and Biological Activity

2018· article· en· W2802835889 on OpenAlexaff
Linda Supe, Saira Afzal, Abid Mahmood, Syeda Abida Ejaz, Martin Hein, Viktor O. Iaroshenko, Alexander Villinger, Joanna Lecka, Jean Sévigny, Jamshed Iqbal, Peter Langer

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Organic Chemistry · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBiochemical and Molecular Research
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
FundersDeutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst
KeywordsChemistryRegioselectivityStereochemistryAlkaline phosphatasePhosphodiesteraseEnzymeNucleotideDocking (animal)Biological activityBiochemistryCatalysisIn vitro

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new methodology for the synthesis of fluorinated and non‐fluorinated 1 H ‐pyrazolo[3,4‐ b ]pyridin‐3‐ones was developed. The reactions proceed by cyclization of electron‐rich 3‐amino‐1 H ‐pyrazol‐5(4 H )‐ones with 1,3‐diketones and the products were obtained in good to excellent yields and with excellent regioselectivity. The products, which can be regarded as deazapurine analogues, were tested for the alkaline phosphatase ( h ‐TNAP and h ‐IAP) and nucleotide pyrophosphatase/phosphodiesterase ( h ‐NPP1 and h ‐NPP3) inhibition profile. Most of the derivatives exhibited selective and potent inhibition on tissue non‐specific and intestinal alkaline phosphatase and nucleotide pyrophosphatase (NPP1 and NPP3) enzymes. Possible binding modes of the most potent inhibitors were studied by molecular docking analysis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.799

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of Organic ChemistrySame topicBiochemical and Molecular ResearchFrench-language works237,207