MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2802871080 · doi:10.1002/cmr.a.21418

A tribute to Alexander Davidson Bain: An NMR pioneer and mentor at McMaster University

2016· article· en· W2802871080 on OpenAlexafffund
Christopher Kumar Anand, Bob Berno, Stephen Boulton, Michael A. Brook, Richard M. Epand, Timothy R Field, Gillian R. Goward, Paul Hazendonk, Giuseppe Melacini

Bibliographic record

VenueConcepts in Magnetic Resonance Part A · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNMR spectroscopy and applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of LethbridgeMcMaster University
FundersMcMaster University
KeywordsTributeIntellectExcellenceStyle (visual arts)Character (mathematics)PsychologyArt historyClassicsPhilosophyArtVisual artsEpistemology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In this tribute to our friend, mentor and colleague Alexander Davidson Bain we have collectively recapitulated the milestones of his career at McMaster university. We start from Alex's scientific and educational achievements and continue with his accomplishments as a community and infrastructure builder. We attempt to provide a sense of the breadth and depth of his seemingly endless scientific contributions while at McMaster by briefly summarizing selected representative examples from his body of work. Following Alex's lead, the scientific account is mixed with anecdotes and “bits of wisdom” we fondly remember from our interactions and collaborations with him. We also touch upon his brilliant and nurturing educational style and his “aggregator” role within the McMaster and wider NMR communities. We conclude with a more personal picture of Alex D. Bain, in which his scientific excellence and profound intellect are inextricably tied to his kind, nurturing and optimistic character and to his uniquely wry humor. He was not just a “good guy,” he was the epitome of the “good guy.”

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.065
Threshold uncertainty score0.129

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0090.006
Scholarly communication0.0080.003
Open science0.0030.005
Research integrity0.0030.010
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0240.013

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueConcepts in Magnetic Resonance Part ASame topicNMR spectroscopy and applicationsFrench-language works237,207