Computed Tomographic Angiography Used for Localization of the Cutaneous Perforators and Selection of Anterolateral Thigh Flap “Bail-Out” Branches
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the territory supplied by the lateral circumflex femoral artery for the consistency of a proximal perforator that could be used as an alternative pedicle for the anterolateral thigh flap if a tedious intramuscular course is encountered during elevation of the perforator used to develop the initial surgical plan. It is hypothesized that a consistent "bail-out" perforator supplying the proximal thigh would facilitate a simpler anterolateral thigh flap harvest, with minimal modification to flap design. METHODS: Computed tomographic images of 9 fresh cadavers were imported using Materialize's Interactive Medical Imaging Control System software to create surface-rendered 3-dimensional reconstructions of 15 lower limbs. Perforators emerging proximally and laterally to a 3-cm radius circle drawn at the midpoint of the anterior superior iliac spine and superolateral patella were considered potential bail-out perforators and evaluated for their number emerging diameter, length, course, and location relative to the anterior superior iliac spine. RESULTS: An average of 2.9 ± 1.8 perforators per limb were identified. Mean pedicle length was 111 ± 20 mm, measured from the origin in the lateral circumflex femoral artery to where the perforators emerged through the deep fascia directly overlying the thigh muscles. Average diameter at origin in the lateral circumflex femoral artery was 2.8 ± 0.8 mm, and that at emergence through the deep fascia was 1.1 ± 0.3 mm. Vessel course was predominantly musculocutaneous (90%). CONCLUSIONS: A significant bail-out perforator routinely supplies the proximal anterolateral thigh and may be used as an alternative vascular pedicle for an anterolateral thigh flap if a tedious intramuscular course is encountered during elevation of a perforator identified within the conventional landmarks (3-cm radius circle at the midpoint of the anterior superior iliac spine and superolateral patella).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".