An extended reference region model for DCE‐MRI that accounts for plasma volume
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The reference region model (RRM) for dynamic contrast‐enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE‐MRI) provides pharmacokinetic parameters without requiring the arterial input function. A limitation of the RRM is that it assumes that the blood plasma volume in the tissue of interest is zero, but this is often not true in highly vascularized tissues, such as some tumours. This study proposes an extended reference region model (ERRM) to account for tissue plasma volume. Furthermore, ERRM was combined with a two‐fit approach to reduce the number of fitting parameters, and this was named the constrained ERRM (CERRM). The accuracy and precision of RRM, ERRM and CERRM were evaluated in simulations covering a range of parameters, noise and temporal resolutions. These models were also compared with the extended Tofts model (ETM) on in vivo glioblastoma multiforme data. In simulations, RRM overestimated K trans by over 10% at v p = 0.01 under noiseless conditions. In comparison, ERRM and CERRM were both accurate, with CERRM showing better precision when noise was included. On in vivo data, CERRM provided maps that had the highest agreement with ETM, whilst also being robust at temporal resolutions as poor as 30 s. ERRM can provide pharmacokinetic parameters without an arterial input function in tissues with non‐negligible v p where RRM provides inaccurate estimates. The two‐fit approach, named CERRM, further improves on the accuracy and precision of ERRM.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".