Antibacterial Activity of Monolayer Graphene Film to Standardised Staphylococcus Aureus Strains
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Due to its unique, unanimously recognized properties and biocompatibility, graphene has wide potential applications in biology, biomedical science, environmental agriculture and biotechnology. The antibacterial effect of the graphene is presented in a large number of publications. Most studies reported in the specific literature were aimed mainly at understanding the interaction between graphene and graphene-based materials with cells and bacteria. Even so, there are conflicting results in some cases and there are also numerous controversies regarding the antibacterial effect of monolayer graphene film on different types of substrate.The study is aimed at testing the antibacterial activity of monolayer graphene film on a copper substrate that was covered with a Staphylococcus aureus culture, Gram-positive bacteria recognized for resilience in external environment. The antibacterial activity of the graphene was evaluated via cell-viability test. It has thus been observed that the bacterial suspension’s phisical contact with the a large-area graphene produces significant disturbances of the microorganism’s vital processes.This study may provide new insights for the better understanding of antibacterial actions of graphene applied on different substrates and opportunities for biomedical applications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".