MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2803284729 · doi:10.1186/s40490-018-0111-0

Influence of climate on tree mortality in taiwania (Taiwania cryptomerioides) stands in Taiwan

2018· article· en· W2803284729 on OpenAlexaff
Chih-Ming Chiu, Ching‐Te Chien, Gord Nigh, Chih‐Hsin Chung

Bibliographic record

VenueNew Zealand journal of forestry science · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant responses to elevated CO2
Canadian institutionsMinistry of Forests
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrecipitationTyphoonDiameter at breast heightForestryEnvironmental scienceGeographyEcologyBiologyMeteorology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Taiwania ( Taiwania cryptomerioides Hayata) is a relict tree species found mainly in Taiwan, with smaller populations in China, Vietnam, and Myanmar. Taiwania is considered to be vulnerable to extinction. The objective of this research was to develop a model to predict the mortality of taiwania from climate and other mensurational variables. The mensuration, mortality, and climate data came from permanent sample plots established as thinning experiments and a nearby climate station. The data were analysed using logistic regression with individual tree mortality as the response variable. The important predictor variables of mortality were social status [defined as diameter at breast height (dbh) divided by average dbh] and annual precipitation in the year of death. The probability of mortality increased as social status decreased and as annual precipitation increased. The positive correlation between mortality and precipitation is likely a consequence of typhoons since precipitation and mortality caused by wind throw both result from typhoons. Climate change could increase the number and severity of typhoons occurring in Taiwan. This may increase the mortality rate of taiwania, which would detrimentally affect the viability of taiwania populations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.036

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNew Zealand journal of forestry scienceSame topicPlant responses to elevated CO2French-language works237,207