MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2803475099 · doi:10.1002/pep2.24077

Identification of an IDR peptide formulation candidate that prevents peptide aggregation and retains immunomodulatory activity

2018· article· en· W2803475099 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenuePeptide Science · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRNA Interference and Gene Delivery
Canadian institutionsCentre for Drug Research and DevelopmentUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious DiseasesCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchCystic Fibrosis Canada
KeywordsPeptideIn vivoChemistryExcipientIn vitroBiocompatible materialBiochemistryBiologyChromatographyMedicineBiomedical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Synthetic peptides derived from naturally occurring host defence peptides (HDPs) have garnered significant attention as novel pharmaceuticals, particularly as alternatives to antibiotics and for immunomodulatory applications. One of the barriers to advancing synthetic peptides for therapeutic applications is their tendency to aggregate under specific ionic conditions similar to those they would encounter in vivo. Formulating peptides with biocompatible excipients that prevent solvent‐induced peptide aggregation represents a possible solution to this aggregation issue; however, this strategy has not been systematically explored. In the present work, we describe the screening of various polymeric substances (including hyaluronic acid, carboxymethyl cellulose and hydroxypropyl methyl cellulose) as formulation candidates for HDPs and identified derivatized hyperbranched polyglycerols (dHPGs) as a biocompatible excipient that limits peptide aggregation. Notably, the immunomodulatory activity of a synthetic innate defence regulator peptide, IDR‐1018, formulated with dHPG was retained when evaluated against both peripheral blood mononuclear cells and human bronchiolar epithelial cells in vitro. Further characterization of dHPG polymers revealed that decreasing the negative charge density on the polymer surface potentiated the cytotoxic effects of IDR‐1018, emphasizing the need to optimize this parameter for future peptide delivery formulations. Importantly, the dHPG formulated IDR‐1018 inhibited peptide aggregation in vitro in the presence of mucin as well as in vivo when injected subcutaneously into CD1 mice. This study highlights the potential use of dHPGs as formulation candidates for synthetic HDPs and identifies important considerations regarding their physico‐chemical properties and relevance to immunomodulatory applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.286
Threshold uncertainty score0.505

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it