MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2803536901 · doi:10.1093/pch/pxy054.147

Reevaluating Immunization Delays Post Red Blood Cell Transfusion

2018· article· en· W2803536901 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Alexandra Zabeida, Nancy Robitaille, Marc Lebel, Christian Renaud

Bibliographic record

VenuePaediatrics & Child Health · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBlood groups and transfusion
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineVaccinationMMR vaccineMeasles-Mumps-Rubella VaccineRubellaMeaslesImmunizationImmunogenicityPediatricsImmunologyBlood transfusionAntibody

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract BACKGROUND Current Canadian guidelines recommend to delay the measles, mumps, rubella (MMR) and varicella live attenuated vaccines by 6 months following transfusion of unwashed red blood cells (RBC) due to potential interference by serum antibodies. Thus, patients chronically transfused with RBC commonly suffer from a delay or absence of MMR and varicella vaccination. Over the last decades, not only has RBC handling changed, but also fewer blood donors have had natural mumps, measles and rubella infections, resulting in lower blood antibody levels. The recommendations may thus be unfounded and outdated, and prevent valuable vaccination opportunities for children with frequent blood transfusions. OBJECTIVES The primary aim of this project was to determine MMR vaccination immunogenicity in patients chronically transfused with RBC. DESIGN/METHODS Medical charts were reviewed for vaccination and transfusion histories. MMR-specific antibodies were quantified in 25 paediatric patients who received both doses of the MMR vaccine at 12 and 18 months of age while they were on a chronic RBC transfusion program for sickle cell disease, B-thalassemia major, Diamond-Blackfan anemia or pyruvate kinase deficiency. There was no formal control group; long-term immunity rates in the literature are ≥90% for all MMR components. RESULTS Table 1 shows immunogenicity to MMR vaccine components. Delays between vaccination and serology testing averaged 5.9 years (0.3 to 15.8 years). CONCLUSION To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study designed to measure the effect of RBC transfusions on MMR vaccine immunogenicity. Although lower than the rates reported in the literature, the results suggest a high rate of immunogenicity to each component of the MMR vaccine in chronically transfused patients. Weighing the risks and benefits of disease prevention in a highly vulnerable population, a reevaluation of immunization delays post RBC transfusions is called for.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.321
Threshold uncertainty score0.829

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePaediatrics & Child HealthSame topicBlood groups and transfusionFrench-language works237,207