MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2803538697

A survey for potential pathogens in wild turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo) in Ontario, Canada

2018· dissertation· en· W2803538697 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff
Amanda M. MacDonald

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Atrium (University of Guelph) · 2018
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicBird parasitology and diseases
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCanadian Wildlife Health CooperativeOntario Federation of Anglers and HuntersPublic Health AgencyPennsylvania Game CommissionPublic Health Agency of CanadaUniversity of Guelph
KeywordsChristian ministryWildlifeMeleagris gallopavoPublic healthGeographyAgency (philosophy)AgricultureFood safetyLibrary sciencePublic administrationEnvironmental protectionEnvironmental healthPolitical scienceVeterinary medicineMedicineBiologyEcologyArchaeologySociologySocial science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The primary purpose of this thesis was to investigate the prevalence and distribution of potential pathogens circulating in wild turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo) in Ontario. Many potential disease-causing agents, amplified by anthropogenic actions, pose a threat to the health of wildlife. Since their reintroduction in 1984, wild turkeys have increased in number and geographic range. Furthermore, these populations geographically overlap with domestic turkey farms (wildlife-livestock interface), and possible pathogen transmission between wild and domestic turkeys is a concern, as they are susceptible to infection with many of the same pathogens. Despite this, information on the health and the occurrence of pathogens that may cause disease in wild turkeys in Ontario is lacking. To address these knowledge gaps, I conducted a retrospective analysis of post-mortem findings and diagnoses for 56 wild turkeys submitted, over a 20-year period, to the Canadian Wildlife Health Cooperative for diagnostic evaluation. Non-infectious diagnoses were more common than infectious, with emaciation identified most frequently. Next, a prospective study was conducted to investigate pathogens previously associated with disease outbreaks or decreased fitness of wild and domestic turkeys. Hunter-harvested and other opportunistically collected wild turkeys (n=215) from across southern Ontario were tested for Mycoplasma spp., Salmonella spp., Escherichia coli, Ornithobacterium rhinotracheale, Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae, Pasteurella multocida, Campylobacter spp., Eimeria spp., avian pox virus, avian influenza viruses, and lymphoproliferative disease virus. Positive E. coli isolates were further tested for antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Laboratory methods included culture, fecal floatation, histopathology, and PCR. Most wild turkeys tested positive for Mycoplasma and Eimeria spp., and over half were positive for E. coli and lymphoproliferative disease virus. There were rare isolations of avian poxvirus and Campylobacter jejuni, and no detection of avian influenza viruses, Salmonella, O. rhinotracheale, E. rhusiopathiae, and P. multocida. Finally, AMR testing performed on Escherichia coli isolates documented limited resistance to antimicrobials. The baseline data provided by this research provides insight into the health of hunter-harvested wild turkeys in Ontario and will aid in future monitoring of disease emergence. In addition, it will contribute to conservation and management strategies that help to ensure sustainable populations of wild turkeys in Ontario.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.079

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Atrium (University of Guelph)Same topicBird parasitology and diseasesFrench-language works237,207