MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2803545230 · doi:10.1089/cren.2018.0022

Ureteral Obstruction Secondary to an Appendiceal Mucocele: A Case Report and Literature Review

2018· article· en· W2803545230 on OpenAlexaff
Melody Djuimo, Liane S. Feldman, Sero Andonian

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Endourology Case Reports · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAppendicitis Diagnosis and Management
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMucoceleAppendixDifferential diagnosisAsymptomaticRadiologyLymphoceleSurgeryComplicationPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Ureteral obstruction is rarely caused by extrinsic compression from the appendix. In addition, mucinous neoplasms of the appendix are rare, found incidentally in 0.2%–0.7% of appendectomy specimens. Case Presentation: We present an unusual case of ureteral obstruction caused by a large appendiceal mucocele. An asymptomatic 53-year-old caucasian male patient, known for recurrent nephrolithiasis, was referred for management of bilateral nephrolithiasis. A noncontrast CT scan found an atrophic kidney with an obstructive 1.8 cm right midureteral stone above a 9 × 4.3 cm appendiceal mucocele compressing the right midureter. Although the impacted ureteral stone was extracted with retrograde ureteroscopy and holmium laser lithotripsy, the appendiceal mucocele was resected by laparoscopic appendectomy. Final pathology analysis revealed an unperforated low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm of 13 cm without lymphovascular invasion. Since the whole mucocele was completely excised, it did not require any further follow-up. Postoperative CT scan demonstrated stone-free status on the right side with residual mild right hydroureteronephrosis. A diuretic renal scintigraphy showed a nonobstructed right kidney with a chronically dilated pelvicaliceal system and a 34% differential function in the right kidney. Follow-up for up to 2 years postoperatively demonstrated that his diuretic renal scan did not show deterioration of the differential renal function, indicating that there was no significant obstruction. Conclusion: This is the fourth reported case of appendiceal mucocele causing extrinsic ureteral obstruction, and the secondary urinary stasis contributed to formation of a large midureteral stone and cortical renal atrophy. This case demonstrates the importance of the work-up and management of obstructive ureteral stones before definitive management of appendiceal mucoceles.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.038
Threshold uncertainty score0.666

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Endourology Case ReportsSame topicAppendicitis Diagnosis and ManagementFrench-language works237,207