Bibliographic record
Abstract
American_ College_ Health_ Association, 2007, AM COLL HLTH ASS NAT; Baumgartner L. M., 2007, LEARNING ADULTHOOD C; Baytiyeh H, 2012, INT J ENG EDUC, V28, P1221; Baytiyeh Hoda, 2012, European Journal of Engineering Education, V37, DOI 10.1080-03043797.2011.644761; Baytiyeh H, 2010, INT J ENG EDUC, V26, P1192; Bouazza A., 2009, DIGEST MIDDLE E STUD, V1, P72; Brockett R.D., 1991, SELF DIRECTION ADULT; Calvani A., 1999, COMUNICAZIONE APPREN; Castells M., 2001, INTERNET GALAXY; CATLEDGE LD, 1995, COMPUT NETWORKS ISDN, V27, P1065, DOI 10.1016-0169-7552(95)00043-7; Cheung W, 2005, BRIT J EDUC TECHNOL, V36, P237, DOI 10.1111-j.1467-8535.2005.00455.x; Communale C. L., 2002, J EDUC TECHNOL SYST, V30, P171; Coombs P., 1985, WORLD CRISIS ED; Crampton J., 2003, POLITICAL MAPPING CY; Delahaye B. L., 2005, HUMAN RESOURCE DEV A; Department of Innovation Universities and Skills, 2009, LEARN REV; Englander F, 2010, EDUC REV, V62, P85, DOI 10.1080-00131910903519793; FIELD A., 2005, DISCOVERING STAT USI; Gay L. R., 2006, ED RES COMPETENCIES; Hayes E., 2005, 46 ANN AD ED RES C; Hedberg B., 1981, HDB ORG DESIGN; Heo G. M., 2007, ANDRAGOGY TODAY INT, V10, P249; Ho R., 2006, HDB UNIVARIATE MULTI; Internet_World_Statistics, 2012, INT US MIDDL E WORLD; Johnson G. M., 2007, CANADIAN J LEARNING, V33, P1; Johnson GM, 2008, INTERNET RES, V18, P382, DOI 10.1108-10662240810897790; Jones S., 2002, PEW INTERNET AM LIFE; KAISER HF, 1970, PSYCHOMETRIKA, V35, P401, DOI 10.1007-BF02291817; Kellerman A., 2002, INTERNET EARTH GEOGR; Kim K., 2004, 2004050 NCES US DEP; KLEIN JI, 1989, J MANAGE STUD, V26, P291, DOI 10.1111-j.1467-6486.1989.tb00729.x; Kubey RW, 2001, J COMMUN, V51, P366, DOI 10.1111-j.1460-2466.2001.tb02885.x; Kuh GD, 2001, RES HIGH EDUC, V42, P87, DOI 10.1023-A:1018768612002; Kuh GD, 2001, J COLL STUDENT DEV, V42, P217; Laird T. F. N., 2004, ANN M ASS I RES; LePine JA, 2000, PERS PSYCHOL, V53, P563, DOI 10.1111-j.1744-6570.2000.tb00214.x; Livingstone S, 2003, YOUNG PEOPLE NEW MED; Matthews D., 2003, INTERNET HIGH EDUC, V6, P125, DOI 10.1016-S1096-7516(03)00020-4; Mezirow J., 2000, LEARNING TRANSFORMAT; NONAKA I., 1995, KNOWLEDGE CREATING C, P279; NSF, 1997, US TEENS TECHN; Odell PM, 2000, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V3, P855, DOI 10.1089-10949310050191836; OECD, 2010, REC NONF INF LEARN O; Ogedebe P. M., 2010, J MATH TECHNOLOGY, V1, P105; Papanis E., 2010, REV EUROPEAN STUDIES, V2, P54; Passerini K, 2000, COMPUT EDUC, V34, P1, DOI 10.1016-S0360-1315(99)00024-X; Peng HY, 2006, EDUC STUD, V32, P73, DOI 10.1080-03055690500416025; Raptis A., 2002, LEARNING TEACHING ER; Starbuck WH, 1996, INT J TECHNOL MANAGE, V11, P725; Tella A., 2007, J ED MEDIA LIB SCI, V45, P161; The_World_Bank, 2012, INT US; Torkzadeh G, 2002, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V18, P479, DOI 10.1016-S0747-5632(02)00010-9; Tsai CC, 2001, COMPUT EDUC, V37, P41, DOI 10.1016-S0360-1315(01)00033-1; Tsai MJ, 2003, INNOV EDUC TEACH INT, V40, P43, DOI 10.1080-135500032000038822; Valente T., 2005, RECENT ADV SOCIAL NE
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.051 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".