Benign Solitary Fibrous Histiocytoma of Xanthomatous Subtype of the Perilimbal Conjunctiva and Adjacent Sclera in a Youth
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AIMS: To report the clinical and pathological features of a benign fibrous histiocytoma of the xanthomatous subtype in the perilimbal conjunctiva and adjacent sclera in a youth. METHODS: An 11-year-old Caucasian boy presented with a yellowish dome-shaped conjunctival mass abutting the inferotemporal limbus of the left eye. The tumor measured 4 mm in its maximum diameter. The lesion was excised and was noted to extend into the sclera. Three years postoperatively, there was no evidence of recurrence. RESULTS: Histopathological examination disclosed a highly cellular lesion composed predominantly of benign-appearing foamy histiocytes without multinucleated giant cells. The tumor contained sparse fibrous septa without a storiform configuration. Immunohistochemical analysis showed diffuse cytoplasmic positive staining with adipophilin, CD34, and CD163. CONCLUSION: A lesion comprised of numerous homogeneous foamy histiocytes without multinucleated giant cells in the perilimbal conjunctiva and adjacent sclera of a youth is presented as a unique case of a rare variant of fibrous histiocytoma of the xanthomatous subtype.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".