The Role of Preventive Major Maintenance in the Costs of Electric Energy Distribution Companies
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objectives: The unwanted and unplanned outages due to faults occurred in electrical energy distribution systems are one of the main concerns of distribution companies. This paper examines this concerning. Methods/Statistical Analysis: This paper examines about ninety outages in related to the medium pressure power lines in second region of Bushehr over twomonth period. Findings: It has identified faults caused by power outages, and the time of outage for each fault is extracted in all regions of the primary data obtained from the power events. Then, by determining the cost function with the purely economic factors, are obtained the costs of each fault individually. In the following, for each fault are provided a series of preventive overhauls or preventive recommendations. Until increasing the system’s trustworthiness, the operating costs of unwanted faults are completely eliminated or minimized. Application/Improvements: The application of this paper is that examines the roles of preventive major maintenance in the costs of electric energy distribution companies. Keywords: Cost Function, Electric Energy Distribution Companies, Energy Not Served (ENS), Preventive Maintenance, Unplanned Outage
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it