Computation of 2D 8×8 DCT Based on the Loeffler Factorization Using Algebraic Integer Encoding
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper proposes a computational method for 2D 8×8 DCT based on algebraic integers. The proposed algorithm is based on the Loeffler 1D DCT algorithm, and it is shown to operate with exact computation—i.e., error-free arithmetic—up to the final reconstruction step (FRS). The proposed algebraic integer architecture maintains error-free computations until an entire block of DCT coefficients having size 8×8 is computed, unlike algorithms in the literature which claim to be error-free but in fact introduce arithmetic errors between the column- and row-wise 1D DCT stages in a 2D DCT operation. Fast algorithms are proposed for the final reconstruction step employing two approaches, namely, the expansion factor and dyadic approximation. A digital architecture is also proposed for a particular FRS algorithm, and is implemented on an FPGA platform for on-chip verification. The FPGA implementation operates at 360 MHz, and is capable of a real-time throughput of$3.6\cdot 10^8$2D DCTs of size 8×8 every second, with corresponding pixel rate of$2.3\cdot 10^{10}$pixels per second. The digital architecture is synthesized using 180 nm CMOS standard cells and shows a chip area of 7.41 mm$^2$. The CMOS design is predicted to operate at 893 MHz clock frequency, at a dynamic power consumption 13.22 mW/MHz$\cdot$V$_{sup}^2$.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".