MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2803831709 · doi:10.1093/jac/dky200

NDM-1-producing Vibrio parahaemolyticus isolated from imported seafood

2018· letter· en· W2803831709 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Arnaud Briet, Nicolas Helsens, Sabine Delannoy, Sabine Debuiche, Anne Brisabois, Graziella Midelet, Sophie A. Granier

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy · 2018
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicVibrio bacteria research studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersRégion Hauts-de-FranceMinistry of Agriculture - Saskatchewan
KeywordsVibrio parahaemolyticusBiologyMicrobiologyVirologyGeneticsBacteria

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Vibrio parahaemolyticus is a marine microorganism, frequently isolated from seafood, at water temperatures above 15 C. Symptoms are abdominal cramps, nausea, diarrhoea, fever, headache and chills. WT V. parahaemolyticus are characterized as being susceptible to all antibiotic classes, except penicillins. . parahaemolyticus strain 16-B3PA-006 was isolated in January 2016, from a shelled shrimp tail imported from Vietnam to France. Antimicrobial susceptibility was tested by the disc diffusion method (Bio-Rad, Marne-La-Coquette, France), following CLSI recommendations. The raw reads were trimmed (minimum length, 35 bp; quality score, 0.03) and assembled in CLC Genomics Workbench 7.5.1, firstly by mapping chromosome 1 and 2 from the V. parahaemolyticus reference genome (V. parahaemolyticus RIMD 2210633) and then de novo assembly of the remaining paired-end reads. A total of 190 contigs were obtained including 60 contigs that did not map the reference genome, indicating the presence of acquired genetic material. The Center for Genomic Epidemiology server (https://cge.cbs.dtu.dk/serv ices/) was used to identify acquired antimicrobial resistance genes (Resfinder), plasmid presence (PlasmidFinder) and ST (MLST).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.690
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations42
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Antimicrobial ChemotherapySame topicVibrio bacteria research studiesFrench-language works237,207