MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2803842701

SKIN DERIVED SCHWANN CELL TRANSPLANT AND IL6 NEUTRALIZATION FOLLOWING NERVE INJURY

2014· article· en· W2803842701 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Prajay Shah

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of undergraduate research in Alberta · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNerve injury and regeneration
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNerve injurySciatic nerveSchwann cellCytokineMedicineImmunologyContext (archaeology)Peripheral nerve injuryProinflammatory cytokineSciatic nerve injuryInterleukin 6Immune systemRegeneration (biology)InflammationNerve growth factorNeuroscienceBiologyPathologyInternal medicineCell biologyAnesthesia
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Schwann cells (SCs), the glial cells of the peripheral nervous system, are highly plastic and are thought to be the key players in successful regeneration following nerve injury. Recently, the use of SC therapy, including therapies using SCs derived from skin (SKPSCs), has shown much potential for improving clinical outcomes after nerve injury. One of the primary mechanisms by which SKPSCs appear to enhance recovery is via the secretion of factors (ie. cytokine) known to play vital roles in regulating inflammation following injury. In particular, interleukin-6 (IL6), a pleiotropic cytokine upregulated after nerve injury, is thought to play an important role in the macrophage recruitment and phenotype regulation important for successful regeneration. Still, others have demonstrated that IL6 can play deletrious roles in the nerve as well. The dichotomous nature of IL6 in the nerve is highly context specific, highly complex and yet to be fully understood. Since we have recently identified IL6 as being expressed by SKPSCs at levels 20x higher than most other cytokines, and this cytokine is notorious for being a potent regulator of the immune system, here, we set out to determine the complex role of IL6 following SKPSCs transplant in the injured nerve. To answer this question, we administered IL6 neutralizing antiody or an IgG control during the first week following sciatic nerve crush injury and immediate SKPSC tranplant. We found that SKPSC tranplants alone increased macrophage densities in the distal stump, however this effect remained unaffected by anti-IL6 or IgG treatment. We also tested for difference in functional recovery due to our treaments and found that peak CMAP amplitudes were greatest when SKPSCs therapy was augmented with anti-IL6 treatment, compared to control treatments. Our results suggest that IL6 ultimately has a comprimising effect on SKPSCs therapy, but this effect is not due to early regulation of macrophage densities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score1.000
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.335
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of undergraduate research in AlbertaSame topicNerve injury and regenerationFrench-language works237,207