LES CONCEPTIONS ET LES RESPONSABILITÉS DES INTERVENANTS SCOLAIRES PAR RAPPORT À LA RÉUSSITE DES ÉLÈVES ET LE LEADERSHIP DES DIRECTIONS D’ÉTABLISSEMENT
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Comme ce fut le cas ailleurs au Canada, le systeme public d’education du Quebec s’est vu dote d’un dispositif d’imputabilite visant l’amelioration de la reussite des eleves et comportant, entre autres, la production d’un plan de reussite par les etablissements et une reddition de comptes. Or, la mise en œuvre de ce dispositif dans les etablissements d’enseignement situes en milieu defavorise apparait plus ardue que dans d’autres milieux en raison de l’ampleur des problemes scolaires des eleves. Cette etude de cas illustre les difficultes rencontrees par une nouvelle direction d’etablissement intervenant dans un tel contexte. Elle met en relief les resistances du personnel enseignant aux changements preconises par la direction, notamment en ce qui concerne le plan de reussite propose. A des fins d’enseignement, elle fournit des elements de discussion sur les conceptions et les responsabilites des intervenants scolaires ainsi que sur l’exercice du leadership par les directions d’etablissement.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".