MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2803924048 · doi:10.1161/str.49.suppl_1.155

Abstract 155: What Predicts Symptomatic Intracranial Hemorrhage in Ischemic Stroke Patients Undergoing Emergent Brain Imaging for Neurological Deterioration After IV tPA?

2018· article· en· W2803924048 on OpenAlexaff
Brandon James, Andrew Chang, Ryan McTaggart, Morgan Hemendinger, Priya Narwal, Katarina Dakay, Brittany Ricci, Brian MacGrory, Shawna Cutting, Tina Burton, Michael Reznik, Ali Mahta, Linda C. Wendell, Bradford Thompson, Matthew Siket, Tracy E. Madsen, Pooja Khatri, Karen L. Furie, Mahesh Jayaraman, Shadi Yaghi

Bibliographic record

VenueStroke · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management
Canadian institutionsBrandon University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineTissue plasminogen activatorStroke (engine)NeuroimagingNauseaLevel of consciousnessVomitingIschemic strokeAnesthesiaInternal medicineIschemia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Early neurological deterioration (END) prompting urgent brain imaging occurs in up to 15% of ischemic stroke patients receiving intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (tPA). Most of these are not related to symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) but lead to unnecessary interruption of the tPA infusion. We aim to determine predictors of sICH in ischemic stroke patients undergoing emergent brain imaging after tPA. Methods: We queried our prospective stroke database and included all patients who received tPA for ischemic stroke from March 1 st , 2015 until March 1 st , 2017. We then identified patients who underwent emergent brain imaging before the planned 24-hour brain imaging and divided these patients into: sICH+ and sICH- defined by NINDS criteria. We compared baseline clinical factors, pre-admission medications, admission blood pressure, symptoms prompting repeat scan [change in level of consciousness (LOC); worsening or new (W/N) neurological symptoms without change in LOC; headache/nausea/vomiting), thrombectomy, 24-hour NIHSS and 90 day outcome. Results: We identified 511 patients who received tPA (sICH rate 4.1%). Emergent repeat brain CT was performed on 108 (21.1%); 17.5% (19/108) had sICH and 21.3% (23/108) occurred during the tPA infusion with only one being related to sICH. The mean time from tPA infusion to symptoms prompting brain imaging in sICH was 7.3 ± 5.3 hours. In patients who underwent emergent brain imaging, sICH+ patients were older (80.2 ± 15.8 vs. 70.8 ± 15.4, p = 0.026), with higher admission NIHSS (14 vs. 7, p = 0.0016) and 90-day mortality (87.5% vs. 22.4%, p<0.001), more likely to have a change in LOC (78.9% vs. 21.3%, p<0.001) and less likely to have W/N symptoms without LOC change (5.3% vs. 42.7%, p=0.002). On multivariable analyses, the only predictor of sICH was LOC change (OR 6.62 95% CI 1.64-26.70, p=0.008). Conclusion: Nearly 95% of patients with ischemic stroke had unnecessary interruption of the tPA infusion for new symptoms shortly after the tPA infusion. A change in LOC was the only predictor of sICH among tPA patients undergoing emergent brain imaging. In this group of patients, the preparation of tPA reversal agents awaiting brain imaging may help reduce tPA reversal times and improve outcomes

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStroke→Same topicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management→French-language works237,207→