E-Banking Effects on Customer Satisfaction: The Survey on Clients in Jordan Banking Sector
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In general, the managers in financial organizations and institutions are willing to maintain customer satisfaction, in order to minimize their cost and strengthen their competitive advantage.In Jordan, most of the commercial banks offer their banking services electronically. Therefore, this research aims to investigate the effects of electronic banking services on customer satisfaction in the lights of survey questions asked to 175 clients in Jordan. The reviewed literature indicates that convenience, privacy, cost, ease of use, personalization and customization and security are six indicators that affect level of customer satisfaction with E-Banking. The survey questions conducted in these six indicators and statistical results shows a positive relationship between level of customer satisfaction and usage of E-Banking among customers. There is positive relationship between five indicators and level of customer satisfaction and usage of E-Banking. Only Privacy is not discovered to have an effect on Customer Satisfaction in Jordan.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it