Fluorescent Nucleobase Analogues with Extended Pi Surfaces Stabilize <scp>DNA</scp> Duplexes Containing <i>O</i><sup>6</sup>‐Alkylguanine Adducts
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Chemical alkylation of DNA produces potentially toxic and mutagenic damage such as O6‐alkylguanine (O6‐alkylG) adducts. Non‐natural nucleoside analogues that pair with DNA adducts provide a potential basis for studying damaged DNA. Herein, we evaluated the base pairing properties of elongated nucleoside analogues containing napthalene‐derived tricyclic nucleobases as DNA adduct‐pairing nucleoside analogues in DNA hybridization probes. DNA duplex melting studies revealed that the elongated nucleoside analogs formed more stable base pairs opposite O6‐alkylG than G and were better able to distinguish between G, O6‐alkylG, and an abasic site than any previously described nucleoside analogue. DNA duplexes containing an elongated base analogue exhibited different fluorescence intensities when paired opposite O6‐alkylG vs. G or abasic sites. Their selectivity for stabilizing alkylated DNA make the elongated hydrophobic base analogues improved candidates for incorporating into DNA hybridization probes targeting O6‐alkylG.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".