MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2804233164 · doi:10.1061/9780784481295.040

Developing Information Model for Multi-Purpose Utility Tunnel Lifecycle Management

2018· article· en· W2804233164 on OpenAlex
Ali Alaghbandrad, Amin Hammad

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueConstruction Research Congress 2018 · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUnderground infrastructure and sustainability
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConstructabilityBuilding information modelingConstruction engineeringComputer scienceTransport engineeringEngineeringSystems engineeringRisk analysis (engineering)Scheduling (production processes)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A Multi-purpose utility tunnel (MUT) is one of the civil infrastructures in urban areas, which accommodates several networks, such as electrical cables, gas, water, and sewer pipes, inside a tunnel. There are several benefits of MUTs compared to buried utilities. However, MUTs are not widely used at the time being due to the high initial construction cost and the need for coordination among utility owners. Building information modeling (BIM) is becoming the main coordination tool for building projects. BIM has been extended to civil infrastructures, such as bridges, roads, and sewer networks. However, BIM extension for MUT information modeling (MUTIM) is yet to be developed. This paper aims to investigate a method for extending BIM to MUT projects taking advantage of similar developments for other infrastructure systems. In addition, a systematic approach for MUTIM use cases is proposed. Five use cases of MUTIM were mentioned in this paper: (1) design review for checking compliance with standards and constructability; (2) 3D coordination for clash detection and resolution; (3) ergonomic design for human accessibility and comfort during construction, inspection and maintenance activities; (4) phase planning for construction and maintenance scheduling using 4D simulation; and (5) quantity takeoff for cost estimation. The first two MUTIM use cases are discussed in detail. A case study is developed to demonstrate the feasibility of the proposed approach. The presented MUTIM approach can improve MUT projects design and coordination efficiency, and reduce project cost, which are the main barriers for promoting MUTs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.899
Threshold uncertainty score0.720

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.088
GPT teacher head0.355
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it