MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2804253857 · doi:10.1093/ndt/gfy104.fp250

FP250FACIT-FATIGUE SCORES IN ADULT PATIENTS AT ENROLLMENT INTO THE GLOBAL AHUS REGISTRY

2018· article· en· W2804253857 on OpenAlexaff
Lisa Sartz, Larry A. Greenbaum, Christian Haas, Elena Román-Ortiz, Hae Il Cheong, Imad Al‐Dakkak, Masayo Ogawa, Spero R. Cataland, Christoph Licht

Bibliographic record

VenueNephrology Dialysis Transplantation · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDiagnosis and Treatment of Venous Diseases
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePediatricsInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION AND AIMS: The scientific literature is limited in terms of defining fatigue levels observed in patients with atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS). This analysis sought to evaluate fatigue in patients with aHUS at time of enrollment into the Global aHUS Registry. METHODS: The observational, noninterventional, multicenter Global aHUS Registry (NCT01522183), initiated in April 2012, is designed to collect demographic characteristics, medical and disease history, and treatment and outcomes data for patients with aHUS. This was an analysis at time of Registry enrollment. Registry enrollment is not linked to any other clinical condition and is consequently a snapshot of characteristics of patients with aHUS in the Registry at a given time point. Fatigue was assessed using the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue scale, in which higher scores indicate better quality of life. The analysis included all patients ≥18 years (y) of age with evaluable data regarding enrollment, date of birth, and FACIT-Fatigue score as of May 5, 2017. Patients were stratified into subgroups based on demographic characteristics, thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) history, dialysis/transplant requirement, hospitalization, and use of eculizumab and plasma exchange/plasma infusion (PE/PI). RESULTS: The Registry enrolled 1549 patients; 621 adult patients had evaluable data for FACIT-Fatigue and were included. Sixty-three percent (n=391) were female and the mean (standard deviation [SD]) age was 42.9 (16.6) y. Ongoing TMA was present in 295 patients (48%) and 159 (26%) were on dialysis at enrollment. Hospitalization within 6 months of enrollment occurred in 165 patients (27%). PE/PI was used in 154 patients (25%) within 6 months. Eculizumab treatment was ongoing in 51 patients (8%) and 241 (39%) had recent treatment. Mean (SD) FACIT-Fatigue score was 34.7 (12.4). Subgroups with the largest differences in mean score were patients on dialysis (25.8, acute; 35.9, none), with recent hospitalization (30.1, yes; 36.7, no), PE/PI use (31.1, yes; 35.8, no), and TMA signs/symptoms (32.5, ongoing; 38.1, resolved since >6 months). CONCLUSIONS: These findings provide a clinical snapshot of patients with aHUS in a real-world setting. Dialysis requirement, recent hospitalization, use of PE/PI, and TMA status had the largest detrimental impact on FACIT-Fatigue scores in adult patients in the aHUS Registry. Future analyses will assess changes in FACIT-Fatigue scores over time with ongoing Registry follow-up.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNephrology Dialysis TransplantationSame topicDiagnosis and Treatment of Venous DiseasesFrench-language works237,207