MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2804258545 · doi:10.19070/2332-2977-1500013

Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria and Omalizumab as an Emerging Therapy

2015· article· en· W2804258545 on OpenAlexaff
Marinas JEC, Jensen Yeung

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Clinical Dermatology & Research · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicUrticaria and Related Conditions
Canadian institutionsWomen's College Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOmalizumabChronic urticariaMedicineEtiologyDiseaseQuality of life (healthcare)DermatologyPediatricsImmunoglobulin EImmunologyInternal medicineAntibody

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is a debilitating condition that affects individuals for an extended period of time.Chronic urticaria is characterized by the presence of characteristic wheal and flare lesions for greater than six weeks.This inflammatory reaction is primarily mediated by histamine release from mast cell degranulation although multiple other physiologic factors are involved.CSU is a diagnosis of exclusion where definitive triggers are not identified, however, associations with autoimmune conditions have been investigated.Second-generation antihistamines are the recommended primary treatment for CSU, but a significant number of cases are refractory to conventional treatments.Omalizumab (Xolair) is an anti-IgE biologic agent recently approved by the Federal Drug Administration for the treatment of CSU.Studies have shown favourable safety profiles and efficacy.Omalizumab shows promise as an agent for the management of recalcitrant symptoms and overall improvement of quality of life.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.178
GPT teacher head0.534
Teacher spread0.355 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Clinical Dermatology & ResearchSame topicUrticaria and Related ConditionsFrench-language works237,207