MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2804342937 · doi:10.1111/jse.12427

A new phylogenetic tribal classification of the grape family (Vitaceae)

2018· article· en· W2804342937 on OpenAlexaff
Jun Wen, Limin Lu, Ze‐Long Nie, Xiu‐Qun Liu, Ning Zhang, Stefanie M. Ickert‐Bond, Jean M. Gerrath, Steven R. Manchester, John K. Boggan, Zhiduan Chen

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Systematics and Evolution · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicHorticultural and Viticultural Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
FundersNational Science Foundation of Sri LankaNational Museum of Natural HistoryCAS-SAFEA International Partnership Program for Creative Research TeamsSmithsonian InstitutionNational Science Foundation
KeywordsVitaceaeGenusBiologyTribeBotanyPhylogenetic treeCladeZoologyGeneGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Vitaceae (the grape family) consist of 16 genera and ca. 950 species primarily distributed in tropical regions. The family is well‐known for the economic importance of grapes, and is also ecologically significant with many species as dominant climbers in tropical and temperate forests. Recent phylogenetic and phylogenomic analyses of sequence data from all three genomes have supported five major clades within Vitaceae: (i) the clade of Ampelopsis , Nekemias , Rhoicissus , and Clematicissus ; (ii) the Cissus clade; (iii) the clade of Cayratia , Causonis , Cyphostemma , Pseudocayratia , Tetrastigma , and an undescribed genus “ Afrocayratia ”; (iv) the clade of Parthenocissus and Yua ; and (v) the grape genus Vitis and its close tropical relatives Ampelocissus , Pterisanthes and Nothocissus , with Nothocissus and Pterisanthes nested within Ampelocissus . Based on the phylogenetic and morphological (mostly inflorescence, floral and seed characters) evidence, the new classification places the 950 species and 16 genera into five tribes: (i) tribe Ampelopsideae J.Wen & Z.L.Nie, trib. nov. (47 species in four genera; Ampelopsis , Nekemias , Rhoicissus and Clematicissus ); (ii) tribe Cisseae Rchb. (300 species in one genus; Cissus ); (iii) tribe Cayratieae J.Wen & L.M.Lu, trib. nov. (370 species in seven genera; Cayratia , Causonis , “ Afrocayratia ”, Pseudocayratia , Acareosperma , Cyphostemma and Tetrastigma ); (iv) tribe Parthenocisseae J.Wen & Z.D.Chen, trib. nov. (ca. 16 spp. in two genera; Parthenocissus and Yua ); and (v) tribe Viteae Dumort. (ca. 190 species in two genera; Ampelocissus and Vitis ).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations118
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Systematics and EvolutionSame topicHorticultural and Viticultural ResearchFrench-language works237,207