FEASIBILITY OF A MANUALIZED FAMILY-BASED SUICIDE PREVENTION STRATEGY TO REDUCE ADOLESCENT SUICIDE RISK AMONG EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT REFERRED YOUTH: A QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract BACKGROUND Suicide is the second leading cause of death among Canadian children and adolescents. Youth who present at an Emergency Department (ED) for suicidal ideation and risk behaviours (SRB) are at increased risk for eventual suicide. Despite this risk, current approaches to standard of care are referral to community resources or primary care where waitlists are common, and interventions may not be evidence-based or incorporate crisis management or family participation. OBJECTIVES To determine the feasibility and acceptability of a manualized, family-centered suicide prevention intervention administered in an outpatient clinic for ED-referred youth. DESIGN/METHODS Youth (aged 12 – 18) and parents presenting to the ED for SRB and referred to the Urgent Psychiatry Care clinic were eligible for the QI program, consisting of weekly individual and family sessions delivered over a 6-week period. The therapist addressed common symptoms and concerns of suicidal youth, sources of conflict within the family, and ways to improve communication and ensure patient safety. Patients were excluded if they did not have a parent or caregiver able to participate. Suicidal ideation and behavior were assessed using youth-report measures, the Suicidal Ideation Questionnaire-Junior (SIQ-JR) and the Harkavy-Asnis Suicide Scale (HASS), at baseline and following program completion. The Mood and Feeling Questionnaire (MFQ) was used to measure depressive symptoms. Participant and therapist feedback was collected at follow-up using quantitative and qualitative measures. RESULTS Ten patients were enrolled and completed baseline measures, however four participants withdrew prior to 6 week completion: two withdrew at week 2 and one participant each withdrew at weeks 3 and 6. As such, 7/10 completed 5 weeks of the intervention. Significant improvement in both suicidal ideation (SIQ-JR, x̅ = -16.67; t(5) = 3.125, p = .026) and SRB (HASS, x̅ = -20.17; t(5) = 3.204, p = .024) were observed. Depressive symptoms also decreased (MFQ, x̅ = -15.5, t(5) = 2.724, p = .042). Youth and caregivers rated the program favorably. Improved family communication was most frequently reported by both patients and caregivers as a main benefit of the program. CONCLUSION These preliminary data indicate that SRB may be improved by a brief manualized, family-focused therapy. Early data suggest that the protocol is feasible and acceptable for adolescents presenting to the ED with safety concerns, and warrant further examination in a controlled trial.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.019 | 0.019 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".