MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2804486596 · doi:10.28932/jmm.v17i2.804

PENGARUH EKSPEKTASI KEGIATAN USAHA TERHADAP INDEKS HARGA SAHAM GABUNGAN (Studi Kasus pada Bursa Efek Indonesia)

2018· article· en· W2804486596 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff
Sumarsono Sumarsono, Safira Amalia Hapsari

Bibliographic record

VenueJurnal Manajemen Maranatha · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicFinancial Analysis and Corporate Governance
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersYork UniversityUniversity of Pennsylvania
KeywordsStock exchangeDividendBusinessStock (firearms)Quarter (Canadian coin)Stock marketComposite indexMonetary economicsEconomicsFinance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The stock price reflect the performance of the company issuing the shares, not only at running time (t0) but also expectations for the future (t+). The intrinsic value of the stock is investor’s income in the form of dividends which depends on the income from business activities, so rating for effect of expectations of business activities can be seen as a reflection of expectations and risks to the performance of the company issuing the shares in the stock market which will affect stock prices, as reflected by Composite Stock Price Index (CSPI). This study aims to assess the effect of expectations of business activities on CSPI. The hypothesis is variables expectations of business activities individually or collectively affect the CSPI. Variable expectations of business activity expectation during the running time (t0) on business activity, financial condition and easiness access to credit and expectations in the future (t+) of business’s situation on three months ahead (t+3) and six months ahead (t+6). The study used survey data quarterly Kegiatan Dunia Usaha conducted by Bank Indonesia started from the first quarter of 2002 until the third quarter of 2016 and the data from Indonesia Stock Exchange Composite Stock Price Index after adjustment. Data taken from the publication of Bank Indonesia and Yahoo Finance. Hypothesis testing is using multiple regressionThe results of hypothesis testing found empirical evidence that the variable expectation of the company's financial condition of the present time and the expectation of business situation six months ahead have a significant positive effect on CSPI and business situation expectation over the next three months have a significant negative effect on CSPI. The variable of expectation of the current business activity and the expectation of easy access of credit have no significant effect to CSPI. All variable of expectation of business activity together have significant influence to CSPI. Keywords: Expectation of Business Activity, Composite Stock Price Index (CSPI).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.036

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJurnal Manajemen MaranathaSame topicFinancial Analysis and Corporate GovernanceFrench-language works237,207