MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2804626912 · doi:10.1093/pch/pxy054.068

DOES THE TIMING OF MEDICAL TREATMENT OF PATENT DUCTUS ARTERIOSUS (PDA) HAVE AN IMPACT ON THE SUCCESS OF TREATMENT IN PRETERM INFANTS?

2018· article· en· W2804626912 on OpenAlexaff
Sharandeep Kaur, Amélie Stritzke, Amuchou Soraisham

Bibliographic record

VenuePaediatrics & Child Health · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Conditions and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineDuctus arteriosusGestational ageApgar scoreBirth weightIbuprofenRetrospective cohort studyLogistic regressionUnivariate analysisInternal medicinePediatricsAnesthesiaPregnancyMultivariate analysisPharmacology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract BACKGROUND Hemodynamically significant patent ductus arteriosus (hsPDA) is the most common cardiovascular problem of prematurity often treated with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs-indomethacin and ibuprofen). There is limited data on the effect of postmenstrual age (PMA) at the time of start of treatment on response rates to NSAIDs in preterm infants with hsPDA. OBJECTIVES The objective of our study was to examine the effect of PMA at the start of treatment on response to NSAIDs in hsPDA. DESIGN/METHODS In this retrospective cohort study, we included infants with gestational age (GA) ≤ 32 weeks admitted to a tertiary NICU between January 2014 and December 2016, who had received one or more doses of NSAIDs for the treatment of hsPDA. Positive response (responders) to NSAIDs was considered if post treatment echocardiogram showed that PDA was either closed or small, and did not require further medical or surgical treatment. We compared baseline characteristics between responders and non-responders using univariate and multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS A total of 183 infants received 257 courses (one, two and three courses in 183, 62 and 12 neonates respectively) of NSAIDs. Positive response rate was overall 60%, and 66%, 48%, and 50% for the first, second, and third course respectively. The baseline characteristics were comparable between responders and non-responders except for higher GA, birth weight (BW), and earlier (<14 days of life) start of NSAIDs in responders. After adjusting for BW, Apgar score and gender, GA at birth but not the PMA, was associated with positive response to NSAIDs (aOR 1.24, 95% CI 1.07, 1.42 for GA; aOR 0.92, 95% CI 0.79, 1.07 for PMA). Early NSAIDs treatment was associated with increased odds of PDA closure (aOR 1.95; 95% CI 1.00–3.8). CONCLUSION Gestational age is the strongest predictor for response to NSAIDs in hs-PDA and PMA at treatment does not affect efficacy of NSAIDs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.062
Threshold uncertainty score0.739

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePaediatrics & Child HealthSame topicCardiovascular Conditions and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207