MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2804626912 · doi:10.1093/pch/pxy054.068

DOES THE TIMING OF MEDICAL TREATMENT OF PATENT DUCTUS ARTERIOSUS (PDA) HAVE AN IMPACT ON THE SUCCESS OF TREATMENT IN PRETERM INFANTS?

2018· article· en· W2804626912 on OpenAlexaff
Sharandeep Kaur, Amélie Stritzke, Amuchou Soraisham

Bibliographic record

VenuePaediatrics & Child Health · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Conditions and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineDuctus arteriosusGestational ageApgar scoreBirth weightIbuprofenRetrospective cohort studyLogistic regressionUnivariate analysisInternal medicinePediatricsAnesthesiaPregnancyMultivariate analysisPharmacology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract BACKGROUND Hemodynamically significant patent ductus arteriosus (hsPDA) is the most common cardiovascular problem of prematurity often treated with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs-indomethacin and ibuprofen). There is limited data on the effect of postmenstrual age (PMA) at the time of start of treatment on response rates to NSAIDs in preterm infants with hsPDA. OBJECTIVES The objective of our study was to examine the effect of PMA at the start of treatment on response to NSAIDs in hsPDA. DESIGN/METHODS In this retrospective cohort study, we included infants with gestational age (GA) ≤ 32 weeks admitted to a tertiary NICU between January 2014 and December 2016, who had received one or more doses of NSAIDs for the treatment of hsPDA. Positive response (responders) to NSAIDs was considered if post treatment echocardiogram showed that PDA was either closed or small, and did not require further medical or surgical treatment. We compared baseline characteristics between responders and non-responders using univariate and multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS A total of 183 infants received 257 courses (one, two and three courses in 183, 62 and 12 neonates respectively) of NSAIDs. Positive response rate was overall 60%, and 66%, 48%, and 50% for the first, second, and third course respectively. The baseline characteristics were comparable between responders and non-responders except for higher GA, birth weight (BW), and earlier (<14 days of life) start of NSAIDs in responders. After adjusting for BW, Apgar score and gender, GA at birth but not the PMA, was associated with positive response to NSAIDs (aOR 1.24, 95% CI 1.07, 1.42 for GA; aOR 0.92, 95% CI 0.79, 1.07 for PMA). Early NSAIDs treatment was associated with increased odds of PDA closure (aOR 1.95; 95% CI 1.00–3.8). CONCLUSION Gestational age is the strongest predictor for response to NSAIDs in hs-PDA and PMA at treatment does not affect efficacy of NSAIDs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.015
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.015
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePaediatrics & Child HealthSame topicCardiovascular Conditions and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207