Pulmonary function after treatment for embryonal brain tumors on SJMB03 that included craniospinal irradiation.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
10021 Background: Treatment of children with embryonal brain tumors (EBT) includes craniospinal irradiation. There are limited data regarding the effect of radiation therapy (RT) on pulmonary function. Methods: Protocol SJMB03 enrolled patients 3 to 21 years of age with EBT. Pulmonary function tests (PFTs) [forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) and forced vital capacity (FVC) by spirometry, total lung capacity (TLC) by plethysmography and diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO)] were obtained following completion of RT, prior to each of four courses of high-dose chemotherapy (cumulative cyclophosphamide dose, 16 g/m2), and 24 months after completion of treatment (ACT). Differences between PFTs obtained following the completion of RT and 24 months ACT were compared using exact Wilcoxon signed rank tests. Results: 303 eligible patients were enrolled between June 24, 2003 and March 1, 2010, 258 of whom had at least one PFT. Median age at diagnosis - 8.9 years (range, 3.1 to 20.4 years). Median spinal RT dose - 23.4 Gy (range, 23.4 to 50.4 Gy). Median cyclophosphamide dose was 16.24 g (range, 0 to 34.38 g). 24 months ACT, DLCO was < 75% predicted in 23% (27/115 evaluated), FEV1 was < 80% predicted in 21% (32/150 evaluated), FVC was < 80% predicted in 27% (46/168 evaluated) and TLC was < 80% predicted in 18% (24/135 evaluated) of patients. DLCO was significantly decreased 24 months ACT compared to the end of RT (median difference (MD) in % predicted, - 3.00%; p = 0.035). Race and cumulative cyclophosphamide dose were not significant predictors of DLCO. DLCO was significantly higher among males (p = 0.037) than females in a model that included time point, sex, RT dose group, RT dose*time interaction and age at diagnosis. The differences in FEV1 ((MD, - 1.00%), FVC (MD, 0.00%) and TLC (MD, -2.00%) were not statistically significant. Conclusions: Among patients with EBT treated with spinal RT, DLCO was significantly decreased 24 months after completion of treatment compared to immediately post-RT. TLC was decreased 24 months ACT, suggesting that a significant minority of patients have restrictive lung disease. Continued monitoring of this cohort to five years ACT is planned. Clinical trial information: NCT00085202.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".