MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2804739641 · doi:10.7939/r3n873730

Orogenic Gold mineralization at 3Ace and Geochemical Characteristics of Quartz Monzonite Dikes at Sprogge, South-east Yukon

2014· article· en· W2804739641 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Shaunaugh C. Whelan

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Alberta Library · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuartz monzoniteGeologyDikeGeochemistryMineralization (soil science)PhylliteMetamorphic rockPlutonSchistTectonicsPaleontologySoil waterSoil science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

3Ace and Sprogge are two Au occurrences in the southeast Yukon, Selwyn Basin. Gold mineralization at 3Ace was previously believed to be intrusion-related, however, recent petrography and geochemical analysis show mineralization to be associated with mid- Cretaceous orogenesis. Gold occurs along fractures within quartz veins hosted in metasediments of the Neoproterozoic Yusezyu Formation of the Selwyn Basin, and precipitated from low salinity, CO2-rich acidic fluids at temperatures around 300°C. Stable isotopes show evidence of fluid mixing and a significant meteoric water component in the system, but a magmatic contribution cannot be ruled out. X-ray diffraction was used to define alteration assemblages associated with Au. Geochemical analysis was also carried out at Sprogge to garner a better understanding of the regional geology and potential for mineralization. Radiogenic isotopic compositions of quartz monzonite dikes at Sprogge yielded estimated ages between 95.7 ± 2.0 Ma and 103.5 ± 1.2 Ma. Whole rock geochemical analyses indicate the quartz monzonite dikes were produced from similar petrogenetic processes to the Hyland and Tungsten plutonic suites.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.508
Threshold uncertainty score0.492

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.146
Teacher spread0.141 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of Alberta LibrarySame topicGeochemistry and Geologic MappingFrench-language works237,207